AI Fluency AcademySome learners choose to sit the independent Applied AI Institute exam. The Academy's job is to send them across cleanly, frame the relationship honestly, and step back. This is where the firewall becomes visible, and where bad design could undo years of credibility work. Three screens, Academy side only.
This is usTwo organizations, one careful handoff. Never one product with two skins. Sharing too much visual DNA at this moment is exactly the failure the firewall exists to prevent.
An honest reflection of where the learner is in the curriculum and how that maps to exam readiness. Not a promise. Not a sales tool. The language is plain: "You have completed 4 of 6 modules. Most candidates who pass the independent exam have completed all six." It tells the truth even when the truth is "not yet."
The moment of departure. The learner is leaving the Academy to begin an exam process at a separate organization. The brief is explicit: make this visible with a deliberate page that explains the relationship, restates the firewall, and offers a clean external link. Not a modal. Not a subtle hyperlink. A page that signals you are crossing a boundary.
What a learner sees in the Academy after sitting the exam elsewhere. The Academy does not know whether they passed, since that data lives at the Institute. But the learner is back, and the Academy welcomes them rather than pretending nothing happened. Per your decision D2, it collects nothing: warm welcome, no "how did it go?" field, the strongest firewall posture.